Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2015 9:34:25 GMT
Well, the only cheap property I had was Mediterranean. So it was one of the other two. I don't exactly know what is meant when it says that the protesters were brutalized. It means that they were removed, no longer any protesters on that property. Two new seemed to arrive though. At least I assume that's what it means.
|
|
|
Post by Alydar on Mar 26, 2015 9:58:27 GMT
Correct! Two protestors were brutalized by the police off the property! Sadly, they were soon replaced due to the deficits, and the occupied properties led to your downfalls. Ahahahaha...
|
|
|
Post by WhITelion on Mar 26, 2015 11:12:19 GMT
Good game. ... No. Not good. No one realized my attempt to create a dilemma in Round 8 & 9, only to flop at the last second. If I succeeded though... I'd have won. I think. I have a ¥62 income. Anyway, turboblaze has Baltic. Connecticut is my cheapest lot. ... Wait. What's that outside? Hey. I told you guys to occupy the lots just for pressure, not actually doing it. *get jetpack*I'm out. (P/S: I'm also the guy who skipped 8 & 9's tax. Just to create a dilemma so we can all be honest with each other.)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2015 12:13:44 GMT
I didn't follow the game closely, but couldn't you just remove the protesters? $50 would be sufficient to eliminate a single protester with taxes, and on Round 9 there were four properties of 2 protesters each that could be protest-free for less than $100.
|
|
|
Post by WhITelion on Mar 26, 2015 12:17:26 GMT
I didn't follow the game closely, but couldn't you just remove the protesters? $50 would be sufficient to eliminate a single protester with taxes, and on Round 9 there were four properties of 2 protesters each that could be protest-free for less than $100. Because I don't want them out? I need to have a situation where 9-11 lots are occupied. That guarantees a dilemma, and everyone will have to be honest with each other. That, or sink the ship.
|
|
|
Post by Imada Saneatsu on Mar 26, 2015 17:51:01 GMT
Umm... dude? The game ended. The ship has been sunk. And besides, you missed an exploit with the cheap properties that renders that plan pointless unless you managed to get exactly 11 properties sunk. I'll let you figure it out. Incognito actually stumbled upon it. I was planning to use it for round 10 but, well...
|
|
|
Post by Imada Saneatsu on Mar 26, 2015 17:55:30 GMT
Wait. Waitwaitwaitwait. YOU skipped out on the round 9 tax? I f*ckin' said that more than one person would skip payment, and that the game would end because of it! That plan was doomed to failure from the start!
An income of 62 means that you beat mine by about 4, and since both of ours were above average turboblaze probably had an even smaller income. Still, if you hadn't ended the game, I think that the exploit and a couple idle threats would have won it for me. Maybe not, but it was a possibility.
Of course, there is no point in trying to determine who would have won so this is all ego boosting anyways.
|
|
|
Post by WhITelion on Mar 27, 2015 5:37:58 GMT
Umm... dude? The game ended. The ship has been sunk. And besides, you missed an exploit with the cheap properties that renders that plan pointless unless you managed to get exactly 11 properties sunk. I'll let you figure it out. Incognito actually stumbled upon it. I was planning to use it for round 10 but, well... I knew about the exploit, but I couldn't do it myself (Connecticut scales badly) and thus I was counting on you two to do so. And I cut Round 9 because if my plan worked, it would guarantee a sure win for me. And if it doesn't, everybody dies. Which is exactly what happened.
|
|
|
Post by Imada Saneatsu on Mar 27, 2015 8:33:06 GMT
...so you're choices were: Keep going and probably win, while getting money even if you lose. Or trying to get a guaranteed win with a slightly bigger reward, with the very large possibility of losing it all. ... Okay. I'll give you this: It took guts to try that. I'm still going to say that it was always to risky, but I guess that if you had pulled it off it would have been impressive.
|
|